Biological and Physiochemical Conditions of the Surface Waters of the Cauca River in the Urban Area of Popayán, Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v20n39a15Keywords:
Coliform, physicochemical conditions of sweet wate, riverbank, biological discharges in riversAbstract
The homes and companies located on the banks of the Cauca River have altered the conditions of the quality of the water generated by residual discharges. Therefore, this paper proposes to analyze the biological and physicochemical conditions of the surface waters that cross the urban area of Popayán, Colombia, and determine if they are suitable for human consumption. For this, an in-situ sampling was carried out in the two river stations. The two points were covered taking into account the dry and rainy seasons. At each point, the parameters were measured to calculate the contamination indicators. Likewise, Ph, diluted oxygen, conductivity and temperature parameters were measured, also other physicochemical parameters such as total alkalinity, total hardness, total phosphorus and suspended total solids were measured as well as the microbiological parameters like total coliforms. It was found that the water source contains high levels of pollutant load and that biological discharge is one of the main causes that alters the quality of the water for drinking. The number of macroinvertebrates in the river decreases by 48% as the river advances through the urban area of the city. According to the BMWP values, highly contaminated carbonated waters enter the urban area. However, due to the flow throughout the water source, the Cauca River can regulate the pollution load according to the result evidenced in the Icomi, Icomo, and Icosus indices.
Downloads
References
[2] A. Bediako & K. Malakame (2020). Preliminary assessment of chemical elements in sediments and larvae of gomphidae (Odonata) from the Blyde River of the Olifants River System, South Africa. Rev. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218135
[3] X. Cao, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, G. Duan, M. Huang & J. Peng (2020). Adaptive variation of sediment microbial communities and indication of fecal- associated bacteria to nutrients in regulated urban river. Rev Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051344
[4] N. Moya, M. Santader, B. Fernández (2019). Evaluación de la calidad ecológica de los rÃos Quirpinchaca y Cachimayu usando macroinvertebrados como bioindicadores de contaminación. Revista Ciencia, TecnologÃa e Innovación. Vol 17 No. 19. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2225-87872019000100002&lang=es
[5] S. Florini, E. Shahsavari, T. Ngo, A. Medina, D. Smith & A. Ball (2020). Factors influencing the concentration of fecal coliforms in Oysters in the rivers Blacwater estuary, UK. Rev. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041086
[6] R. Bridgemohan, D. Bachoon, Y. Wang, P. Bridgemohan, C. Mutiti & A. Ramsubhag (2020). Identifying the primary sources of fecal contamination along the beaches and rivers of Trinidad. Rev. Water & Health. 18 (2): 229-228. https://iwaponline.com/jwh/article/18/2/229/73032/Identifying-the-primary-sources-of-fecal
[7] F. Terefe, D. Diriba, F. Senbeta & G. Gebresenbet (2020). Physicochemical Characterization of effluents from industries in Sbata towon of Ethiopia. Rev Cellpress. https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2405-8440%2820%2931468-7
[8] L. Serrano, A., Borges, F Pruski & M. De Melo, (2020). A new approach to use load duration curves to evaluate water quality: a study in the doce river Basin, Brazil. Rev Water. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/3/811
[9] B. Shukla, P. Sharma & M. Khan (2020). Physico-chemical study of some surface water bodies of Punjab. Rev RAFAS. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1531/1/012121/pdf
[10] J. Przbylska, J. Kaleta & Kozlwski (2019). Impact of cedzyna reservoir on selected physicochemical parameters of river water quality (Swietokrzyskie miuntains, Poland). Rev Sciendo. 117-125. https://content.sciendo.com/configurable/contentpage/journals$002fcdem$002f24$002f1-2$002farticle-p117.xml
[11] M. Desrosiers, B. Alloul & C. Spilmont (2020). Selection of macroinvertebrate indices and metrics for assessing sediment quality in the St. Lawrence river (QC, Canada). Rev Water. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/12/3335
[12]. K. Kakouei, S. Domisch, J. Kiesel, J. Kail & S. Jahnig (2020). Climate model variability leads to uncertain predictions of the future abundance of stream macroinvertebrates. Rev Scientific reports. No 2520. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-59107-y
[13] T. Eriksen, N. Friberg, J. Brittain, G. Soli, A. Ballot, E. Eriksen, T. Blakseth & H. Veiteberg (2021). Ecological condition, biodiversity and major enrironmental challenges in a tropical river network in the Bago District in South-Central Myanmar: First insights to the unknown. Rev. Limnologica. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0075951120301973?via%3Dihub
[14] P. Musonge, P. Boets, K. Lock & P. Goethal (2020). Drivers of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in equatorial alpine rivers of the Rwenzoris (Uganda). Rev Water. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1668
[15] O. Gamarra, M. Barrena, E. Barboza, J. Rascón, F. Corroto & L. Taramona (2018). Fuentes de contaminación estacionales en la cuenca del rÃo Utcubamba, región Amazonas, Perú. Revista Arnaldoa vol 25. No 1. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S2413-32992018000100011&script=sci_arttext
[16] L. Blandón (2019). Calidad de las aguas superficiales en la microcuenca rÃo Pire, muicipio de Condega Nicaragua. Revista CientÃfica de Farem-EstelÃ, medio ambiente , tecnologÃa y desarrollo humano. No 31, pp. 58-64. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7304355
[17] A. Gheethi, J. Rahman, R. Radin, B. Talips & E. Mohd (2020). Bacteria Load Assessment at Sungai Benut in Simpang Renggam, Johor. Earth and Environmental Science 498. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/498/1/012061/pdf
[18] H. Pedrana, E. Novita, I. Andriyani & B. Purnomo (2020). Land use to water quality Bedading river, Indonesia. RevEarth and Environmental Science. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/477/1/012015/pdf
[19] Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, CEPAL (s. f). Agua para el Siglo XXI para América del Sur. De la visión a la Acción. Informe Colombia. https://www.cepal.org/samtac/noticias/documentosdetrabajo/5/23345/InCo00200.pdf
[20] J. RodrÃguez, A. Polania, E. Zapata, P. Villegas & M. Montañez (2019). Caracterización fisicoquÃmica del agua de la quebrada La Toma, de la ciudad de Neiva, Huila, Colombia. Teknos Revista CientÃfica 19(1) 27-28. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7444773
[21] AlcaldÃa Municipal de Popayán (2013). Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial de Popayán. http://popayan.gov.co/sites/default/files/documentosAnexos/pot-popayan.pdf
[22] J. Casanova, A. Figueroa (2015). Determinación del Caudal Ambiental y su relación con variables Ãndicadoras de Calidad del Recurso HÃdrico. Luna Azul, (40). http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/luaz/n40/n40a02.pdf
[23] Instituto de HidrologÃa, MeteorologÃa y Estudios Ambientales IDEAM. (2010). Estudio Nacional del agua. (T. Omar, Ed.) (IDEAM). Bogotá D.C. http://www.andi.com.co/Uploads/ENA_2010.compressed.pdf
[24] Departamento Administrativo Nacional de EstadÃstica DANE, Serie nacional de poblacion por área, para el periodo 2018 – 2070. (2020). https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/proyecciones-de-poblacion
[25] AlcaldÃa de Popayán (2020). Nuestra geografÃa. http://popayan.gov.co/ciudadanos/popayan/nuestra-geografia
[26] Corporación Humanas – Centro Regional de Derechos Humanos y Justicia de género (2016). Información estadÃstica contexto regional, Deparatamento del Cauca Municipios de Popayán y Sucre. https://docplayer.es/85193380-Sigue-la-1325-boletin-n-26-informacion-estadistica-contexto-regional-departamento-del-cauca-municipios-de-popayan-y-sucre.html
[27] R. RamÃrez, R. Restrepo & G. Viña (1997). Cuatro Ãndices de contaminación para caracterización de aguas continentales. Formulaciones y aplicación. Revista CT&F- Ciencia, TecnologÃa y Futuro. Vol 1 No 3. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-53831997000100009
[28] R. RamÃrez & M. Cardeñosa (1999). Ãndice de contaminación para caracterización de aguas continentales y vertimientos. Formulaciones. Revista Ciencia, tecnologÃa y futuro. Vol 1, No 5, pp. 89-99. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ctyf/v1n5/v1n5a08.pdf
[29] G., Roldán, J. J. RamÃrez (2008). Fundamentos de limnologÃa Neotropical 2da Edición. MedellÃn, Colombia: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. https://repositorio.accefyn.org.co/handle/001/71
[30] N. Fernández, G., Ramos & F. Solano (2004). ICATEST V 1.0. Una herramienta informática para el análisis y valoración de la calidad del agua. Revista Bistua. Vol 2, No 002, pp 88-97. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/903/90320212.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The total or partial reproduction of the contents of the journal for educational, research, or academic purposes is authorized as long as the source is cited. For reproduction for other purposes, express authorization from the Sello Editorial Universidad de MedellÃn is required.