Efectos de la internacionalización sobre la demanda de trabajo en la industria manufacturera colombiana, 1974-2015

Sonia Alexandra Agudelo Ayala | Biografía
Universidad de Medellín

Resumen

Colombia experimentó un importante cambio estructural a principios de los años noventa. Este cambio estructural está relacionado con las grandes reformas del comercio y del mercado laboral emprendidas en torno a 1992, que se considera el año de inflexión. Este trabajo se centra en evaluar si el cambio estructural en la exposición al comercio internacional alteró significativamente la respuesta del empleo a los cambios salariales en la industria manufacturera. Se utiliza el marco de Hamermesh (1993) para explicar el efecto total sobre el empleo, que se compone de los efectos de sustitución y de escala. Este efecto total se cuantifica empíricamente y se desentrañan sus dos componentes. Encontramos que la elasticidad del empleo de un cambio salarial pasó de -1.05 en 1974-1991 a -1.56 en 1992-2015. Por componentes, el efecto de sustitución aumentó de -0.68 a -1.19. y el efecto de escala se mantuvo estable en -0.38. Estos resultados sugieren que la liberalización del comercio ha tenido consecuencias negativas en el bienestar de los trabajadores. Una mayor sensibilidad de la demanda de mano de obra se ha asociado a una mayor carga fiscal de los trabajadores y a una mayor inestabilidad de los resultados del mercado laboral (Rodrik, 1997). Por lo tanto, los aumentos de la imposición sobre las nóminas experimentados durante los años noventa pueden haber provocado la destrucción de puestos de trabajo y un aumento de la carga fiscal de los trabajadores, mientras que los procesos de sustitución de capital por trabajo pueden haberse acelerado debido a la mayor sensibilidad del empleo.

Referencias

  1. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. H., & Price, B. (2016). Import competition and the great US employment sag of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1) Part 2, S141-S198. https://doi.org/10.1086/682384.
  2. Agudelo, S. A. (2019). Three essays on the Colombian labour market: a macroeconomic perspective [Ph.D.Thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/669487.
  3. Agudelo, S. A., & Sala, H. (2016). Wage setting in the Colombian manufacturing industry. Economics of Transition, 24(1), 99-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12085.
  4. Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1.
  5. Arango, C. A., & Rojas, A.M. (2004). Demanda laboral y reforma comercial en el sector manufacturero colombiano: 1977-1999. Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 21(44), 96-154. https://doi.org/10.32468/Espe.4403.
  6. Arbache, J., Dickerson, A., & Green, F. (2004). Trade liberalisation and wages in developing countries. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F73-F96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00188.
  7. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some test of specification for panel data: Montecarlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economics Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
  8. Autor, D. H., F. Levy and R. J. Murnane (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801.
  9. Autor, D. H., D. Dorn, and G.H. Hanson (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. The American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121.
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
  11. Böckerman, P., & Marilanta, M. (2012). Globalization, creative destruction, and labour share change: Evidence on the determinants and mechanisms from longitudinal plant-level data. Oxford Economic Papers New Series, 64(2), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr03.1.
  12. Bruno, G. S. F. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87(3), 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.005.
  13. Bruno, G. S. F., Falzoni, A. M., & Helg, R. (2004). Measuring the effect of globalization on labour demand elasticity: An empirical application to OECD countries. Working paper No. 153, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”, 1-29.
  14. Cárdenas, M., & Bernal, R. (2004). Determinants of labor demand in Colombia. 1976-1996. NBER Chapter 4, 229-272. En J. Heckman, J.J. & Pagés, C. Law and employment: Lessons from Latin American and the Caribbean, University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/law-and-employment-lessons-latin-america-and-caribbean/determinants-labor-demand-colombia-1976-1996.
  15. Caselli, M. (2014). Trade, skill-biased technical change and wages in Mexican manufacturing. Applied Economics, 46(3), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.848033.
  16. Conte, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2011). Imported skill-biased technological change in developing countries. The Developing Economics, 49(1), 36-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.993480.
  17. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531.
  18. Elsby, M. W. L., Hobjin, B., & Sahin, A. (2013). The decline of the US labor share. Brokings Papers on Economic Activity, 47(2), 1-63.
  19. Fajnzylber, P., & Maloney, W. F. (2005). Labor and trade reform in Latin America. Journal of International Economics, 66(2), 423-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.08.002.
  20. Ferguson, C. E., & Maurice, S. C. (1973). Factor demand elasticity under monopoly and monopsonyZ Economica, 40(158), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551779.
  21. Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 4th Edition, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
  22. Gonzaga, G., Menezes, N., & Terra, C. (2006). Trade liberalization and the evolution of skill earnings differentials in Brazil. Journal of International Economics, 68(2), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.07.008.
  23. Greenaway, D., Morgan, W. & Wright, P. (1999). Exports, export composition and growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 8(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199900000004.
  24. Hamermesh, D. (1993). Labor demand. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  25. Hasan, R., Mitra, D., & Ramaswamy, K. V. (2007). Trade reforms, labor regulations, and labor demand elasticities: Empirical evidence from India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 466-481.
  26. Hansen, B. E. (2001). The new econometrics of structural change: Dating breaks in U.S. labour productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 117-128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696520.
  27. Hijzen, A., & Swaim, P. (2010). Offshoring, labour market institutions and the elasticity of labour demand. European Economic Review, 54(8), 1016-1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1104698.
  28. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
  29. International Labour Organization -ILO- (2015). The Labour Share in G20 Economies.
  30. International Monetary Fund -IMF- (2017). World Economic Outlook: Gaining Momentum? Washington, April, 1-238.
  31. Isaza, J. G., y Meza, C.A. (2004). La demanda de trabajo: teoría y evidencia empírica para el caso colombiano. Equidad y Desarrollo, 1(2), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.19052/ed.392.
  32. Jafari, Y., Othman, J., & Nor, A. H. S. M. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollutants in Indonesia. Journal of Policy Modelling, 34(6), 879-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.05.020.
  33. Judson, R. A. & Owen, A. L. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: A guide for macroeconomists. Economic Letters, 65(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00130-5.
  34. Judzik, D. & Sala, H. (2013). Productivity, deunionization and trade: Wage effects and labour share implications. International Labour Review, 152(2), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00178.x.
  35. Karanassou, M., Sala, H. & Snower, D.J. (2007). The macroeconomics of the labor market: Three fundamental views. Portuguese Economic Journal, 6(3), 151-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.950947.
  36. Krishna, P., Mitra, D., & Chinoy, S. (2001). Trade liberalization and labour demand elasticities: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of International Economics, 55(2), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00089-7.
  37. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Smith, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y.
  38. Levin, A., & Lin, C. (1993). Unit root tests in panel data: New results. Discussion paper No. 93-56, Department of Economics, University California at San Diego.
  39. Levin, A., Lin, C., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.
  40. Lewis, P.E.T., & MacDonald, G. (2002). The elasticity of demand for labour in Australia. Economic Record, 78(240), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.00036.
  41. Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 603-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631.
  42. Manning, A. (2004). We can work it out: The impact of technological change on the demand for low-skill workers. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(5), 581-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00322.x.
  43. Malgouyres, C. (2017). The impact of Chinese import competition on the local structure of employment and wages evidence from France. Journal of Regional Science, 57(3), 411-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12303.
  44. Medina, C., Posso, C. M., Tamayo, J. A., & Monsalve, E. (2012). Dinámica de la demanda laboral en la industria manufacturera colombiana 1993-2009: una estimación Panel VAR. Borradores de Economía, 694. https://www.banrep.gov.co/es/borrador-694.
  45. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408.
  46. Njikam, O. (2016). Trade liberalization, labor market regulations and labor demand in Cameroon. International Review of Economics & Finance, 43. 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.001.
  47. OECD (2016). Reviews of labour market and social policies: Colombia. January, 1-36. Petra, D. (2017). Determinants of labour´s income share in the era of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew023.
  48. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336182.
  49. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Institute for International Economics, Washington.
  50. Russell, B., & Tease, W. (1991). Employment, output and real wages. Economic Record, 67(196), 34-45.
  51. Saha, B., Sen, K. & Maiti, D. (2013). Trade openness, labour institutions and flexibilisation: Theory and evidence from India. Labour Economics, 24, 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.008.
  52. Sala, H., & Trivín, P. (2012). Structural changes in Spanish labour demand: Does Rodrik.s conjecture hold? Article presented at the IV Congreso Nacional sobre mercado de trabajo y relaciones laborales (Universidad de Valladolid, April 2012).
  53. Selwaness, I., & Zaki, C. (2019). On the interaction between exports and labor market regulation: Evidence from the MENA countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 73, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.05.011.
  54. Senses, M. Z. (2010). The effects of offshoring on the elasticity of labor demand. Journal of International Economics, 81(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.02.001.
  55. Seo, H. J., Kim, H. S., & Lee, Y. S. (2015). Globalization and labour demand elasticities: Empirical evidence from nine OECD countries. The Korean Economic Review, 31(2), 413-439.
  56. Slaughter, M. J. (2001). International trade and labor demand elasticities. Journal of International Economics, 54 (1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00057-X.
  57. Stock, J. H. & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Stock, J. H., Andrews, D. W. K., (Eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 80-108. (Ch. 5).
Cómo citar
Agudelo Ayala, S. A. (2022). Efectos de la internacionalización sobre la demanda de trabajo en la industria manufacturera colombiana, 1974-2015. Semestre Económico, 25(58), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v25n58a5

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Estamos indexados en